Flaws in radiometric dating

Help us reduce the maintenance cost of our online services.

Because your computer is running an older version of internet browser, it no longer meets the features of modern websites.

Over the years, Answers in Genesis has committed to undermining the credibility of radiometric dating techniques.

Their motivation is obvious: all techniques consistently yield age estimates far older than the purported So where to start?

flaws in radiometric dating-34flaws in radiometric dating-4

So if scientists believe that a creature lived millions of years ago, then they would need to date it another way. They assume dinosaurs lived millions of years ago (instead of thousands of years ago like the bible says).Evolutionists assume that the rate of cosmic bombardment of the atmosphere has always remained constant and that the rate of decay has remained constant.Scientists place great faith in this dating method, and yet more than 50% of radiocarbon dates from geological and archaeological samples of northeastern North America have been deemed unacceptable after investigation.You can help Amazing Discoveries reduce costs by upgrading or replacing your internet browser with one of the options below.We thank you in advance for partnering with us in this small but significant way. All methods of radioactive dating rely on three assumptions that may not necessarily be true: It is assumed that the rate of decay has remained constant over time.

Leave a Reply